written by Eric J. Ma on 2019-10-05 | tags: teaching bayesian statistics
Do we use multiple examples to highlight the same point, or do we take one example and layer on complexity? It all depends.
Do people learn better by:
I think both are needed, but I am also torn sometimes by whether it’s more effective to communicate using the former or the latter.
Case in point: In teaching Bayesian statistics, the coin flip is a particular case of the Beta-Binomial model. However, the Beta-Binomial model can be taken from its most elementary form (estimation on one group) through to its most sophisticated form (hierarchically estimating p).
I guess if the goal is to show how broadly applicable a given model class (i.e. the beta-binomial model) is, a teacher would elect to jump between multiple examples that are apparently distinct. However, if the goal is build depth (i.e. going from single group to multiple group estimation), sticking with one example (e.g. of baseball players, classically) would be the better strategy.
Both are needed, just at different times, I think. Thinking through this example, I think, gives me a first-principles way of deciding which approach to go for.
@article{
ericmjl-2019-multiple-generalized,
author = {Eric J. Ma},
title = {Multiple Coin-Flips vs. One Coin Flip Generalized?},
year = {2019},
month = {10},
day = {05},
howpublished = {\url{https://ericmjl.github.io}},
journal = {Eric J. Ma's Blog},
url = {https://ericmjl.github.io/blog/2019/10/5/multiple-coin-flips-vs-one-coin-flip-generalized},
}
I send out a newsletter with tips and tools for data scientists. Come check it out at Substack.
If you would like to sponsor the coffee that goes into making my posts, please consider GitHub Sponsors!
Finally, I do free 30-minute GenAI strategy calls for teams that are looking to leverage GenAI for maximum impact. Consider booking a call on Calendly if you're interested!